House Says Bloggers Don't Count As Journalists

Greetings!  I’m Mark Micheau, manager of research services at
Which point of view do you share?  Should bloggers be considered as journalists or not?  Well, I have an article for you today that may help you to make up your minds.  This article has been written by a very impeccable source and I now urge you to read it.
I’m Mark Micheau wishing you a great day.
House Says Bloggers Don’t Count As Journalists
Jason Lee Miller | Staff Writer

Forgets the First Amendment
Two versions of a bill in Congress would enshrine a journalist’s right to keep his or her sources confidential, effectively banning the government from forcing journalists to reveal whistleblowers. One version though–the House version–gives an incredibly stupid definition of journalist that excludes not only bloggers, but freelancers, independents, and nonprofit journalists as well.
For the most part, the Senate and House agree on what a journalist’s duties are and what journalism entails:
“the regular gathering, preparing, collecting, photography, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing of news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public.”
But only the House version, which has more cosponsors than brains apparently, adds to that definition:
“for a substantial portion of the person’s livelihood or for substantial financial gain and includes a supervisor, employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such covered person.”
So, in effect, if journalism is a hobby or passion you do as a public service, or if you are a freelancer without a boss–both of which easily describe a blogger–then the government reserves the right to force you to tell them who told you something, much like the government tried to do with New York Times journalist Judy Miller under the Bush Administration.
Apparently our “representatives” have a real problem with citizen journalism done for the sake of journalism and for the good of democracy, and believe protecting the “free flow of information” is only reserved for officially approved press. No bloggers, no patriotic radicals, no underground agitator pamphleteers like the ones who actually founded and fought for this country to begin with.
Hate to (once again) school our freaking government about the freaking Constitution they freaking pledge to uphold, but this is Congress making a law abridging the freedom of the press, a violation of the First Amendment. I might be more sympathetic if they missed one further down the list, BUT IT’S THE FIRST FREAKING ONE.
By defining who is and who is not considered press, and therefore deciding who is entitled to special protection–in this case, especially, where they base it on who does it for money and who does it for passion (hint: the latter one is more likely to dig up something that matters)–the House of Representatives are doing us all a huge disservice if they don’t change that language.
>> Should bloggers be afforded the same
protections as traditional journalists? <<
Let Us Know What You Think
— WebProNews is an publication —
iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd Second Floor Lexington, KY 40509
If you would like to learn more about us and the services we offer, then please visit
If you would like to keep abreast of some of the most important happenings affecting your lives today, then please visit  There you will get the latest news roundups on such topics as:
Stress, anxiety, and depression. News for retirees, seniors, and aging baby boomers.  Security tips for home computer users.  Home business opportunities, Internet business opportunities, small business opportunities, business opportunities in Asia.  You will also learn how to obtain tremendous personal and financial satisfaction by selling your knowledge and experience.

About Donna Jodhan

Donna Jodhan is an award winning blind author, advocate, sight loss coach, blogger, podcast commentator, and accessibility specialist.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.